Comments - GTO Driver Tries To Look Cool Ends up a Fool
category: Accidents | views: 61154 | posted on: 09/05/2008
Did you know that car goes from 0 to douchebag in 1.8 seconds? And it has leather seats standard!
illegalimmigrant [ban] | Sep 5 08 : 5:37am
u know i try to go get one of those but the i cant beleive the dum dealer estupid man. i wanted to trade in pedro and they only wanna give me 50 pesos for my donkey so i burn pedros nalgas out of that dealer. 
Killerdude [ban] | Sep 5 08 : 4:26am
+4
Kit finally had enough of that douchebag hasselhoff..he's taking over now
en jaywest [ban] | Sep 5 08 : 5:46am
+3
cant handle the car? get something with less power. like a neon or a smartcar.
scotty2hotty! [ban] | Sep 5 08 : 6:06am
+3
Just because you have a dick doesn't mean you can fuck!
Just because you have a gun doesn't mean you can shoot!
Just because you have a fast car doesn't mean you can drive! Get back on your skateboard!
The crashes were better and only YOU got hurt!
tripnmick2466 [ban] | Sep 5 08 : 6:57am
+1
GTO 
,,it will always be a Monaro in my eyes: http://www.autoblog.com/2 004/12/16/a-real-...-vs-m onaro-vxr/
I once owned a HZ GTS Monaro http://www.holden.com.au/ www-holden/jsp/ch...ohist ory/hz.jsp
handled like a lead brick, way to fast for it's brakes and chewed the juice like there was no tomorrow, and I loved every seconded of it(not counting the all the time spent fixing the money pit) fuck we had some fun..
+2
No automaker should revive a dead name unless the car is superior to the original. The new Charger is a poser's wannebe. The new 'old style' Camaro is a fucking joke. Ford's GT40 is a passable example of reviving a dead name. If you didn't keep the name going in the past, then all you're doing is following some trend. The Chevy Corvette is a respectable American musclecar because it has the lineage and the faith of the automaker to keep the 'idea' of what the Corvette represents, even in tough times. I think it shows the lack of imagination of domestic designers going back to a style from 50 years ago, like the 'revived' Thunderbird.
cucarachito [ban] | Sep 5 08 : 7:37am
+2
he wasnt trying to look cool. YOU wait till the day you look in your rear view mirror and see a border patrol truck headed in your direction, see how YOU react.
...
editors note: this comment is only funny if you are an illegal alien living in the united states.
...so , basically ..half the population in l.a.
+1
Fucking turd-burglar.
And this is a real GTO
http://www.psgenergy.com/ GTO/MVC-197S.JPG
Whiskey_williams [ban] | Sep 5 08 : 9:40am
+2
Why do americans drive big engined cars etc when they are only allowed to do 55mph??
-
yet we drive smaller engined cars and can do 70mph??
Thanks for the info 
All ive ever seen is cops pull people over in movies etc and say 'you do know the limit is 55' so i guessed that was the limit (my fault)
I quit often make the 45min journey to my brothers at around 130mph.....just to cut the boring drive down a bit...and boy its faster 
melburner88 [ban] | Sep 5 08 : 9:40am
yes he was the fool, an april fool as it would seem
......................... ...wait.....what?
lol thats a bad corner for dipshits just seen this vid the otherday http://www.youtube.com/wa tch?v=KQ1RCY11DOs same exact on ramp
+3
No automaker should revive a dead name unless the car is superior to the original. The new Charger is a poser's wannebe. The new 'old style' Camaro is a fucking joke. Ford's GT40 is a passable example of reviving a dead name. If you didn't keep the name going in the past, then all you're doing is following some trend. The Chevy Corvette is a respectable American musclecar because it has the lineage and the faith of the automaker to keep the 'idea' of what the Corvette represents, even in tough times. I think it shows the lack of imagination of domestic designers going back to a style from 50 years ago, like the 'revived' Thunderbird.
i can go either way on reviving an iconic automobile. A newer GTO is far superior to most(if not all) older GTO's(net vs. gross rating HP),ride,MPH, fit/finish, etc., the newer GTO's are kinda ugly, beyond that major drawback, it's a badass. 400+HP stock at a net rating is allways a good thing, and at around 30large, a bargain.
same argument as above with the new Challenger and Camaro.
Corvettes are (historically) "sports-cars" not muscle-cars.
All automakers follow trends. it's the nature of the beast.
as an aside, i remember very well going with my Dad when he bought a new 65 GTO. Black w/red intr., 4sp., etc., etc., Hot rides were allways in our family too(uncles/cousins).
I've owned a 71 440 'Cuda, 70 Nova SS, and a couple of other "muscle-cars", and would take anyone of those old cars anyday of the week over their newer rendentions, but as hard as it is for me to admit to, the newer cars are far and away superior autos. objectively speaking(IMO).
Earth Nelson [ban] | Sep 5 08 : 10:18pm
You said it right. Your old man had it right too. The Cuda rocks still.
The era of musclecars, say mid 60's thru early 70's is unique. Domestic automakers were testing the limits of wide range appeal to very high hp cars. In 1965, you could order a 'Vette convertible with a 427 fuel injected putting out over 550 hp. Many big block musclecars of that era were putting out over 450 hp. You can't compare what was being built then to what is available stock today. I used the GT40 as a passable example because it is superior in every aspect to the original. My point is, you can't take the style, or image of a by gone era and not pay homage to what the point of that car was - horsepower.
i've seen a vette do the same thing on the same road....
why?
http://www.liveleak.com/v iew?i=90c_1220031357
reply | quote
Krazy [ban] | Sep 5 08 : 4:17am
+1
Learm to control a mini first dick head